There is sufficient evidence which proves that a Boeing 757 could not have possibly flown into the Pentagon; for starters, the hole that was made is 59 feet too narrow, there were wooden desks, chairs, even a wooden stool with an open book on it that had been unscathed by whatever made that hole in the Pentagon. If the plane did hit the Pentagon, the fire would've been a lot bigger and would've blazed a lot longer - the wooden desks and the stool with the open book on it would've been singed without a doubt. Also the size of the hole, would've been 59 feet wider.
The size of the fire at the Pentagon compared to those at the twin towers doesn't even compete. Logically, since the plane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon was of similar size to those that flew into the towers, you would think that the impact on the Pentagon would be as large and powerful but instead is weaker and the damage a lot smaller. If the Boeing 757 did in fact strike the Pentagon, an explanation is definitely needed for the practically unscathed side of the building where office furniture is still intact and wooden furnishings not burnt. There are even windows that are still fully in tact on the upper floors while it seems that a lot of the bottom windows have been blown out. This suggests to me that what really made the impact was made by some type of missile or by a tremendously smaller aircraft.
There is no evidence at the site of materials such as seats, parts of the engine, bodies or even luggage. If the alleged plane did hit the Pentagon, there would be more evidence than people could get their hands on which is what reinforces the theory that the Boeing 757 could not possibly have flown into the Pentagon. The government of the United States of America have lied to the whole world about events that occurred that horrible day, what are they really trying to hide?
The size of the fire at the Pentagon compared to those at the twin towers doesn't even compete. Logically, since the plane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon was of similar size to those that flew into the towers, you would think that the impact on the Pentagon would be as large and powerful but instead is weaker and the damage a lot smaller. If the Boeing 757 did in fact strike the Pentagon, an explanation is definitely needed for the practically unscathed side of the building where office furniture is still intact and wooden furnishings not burnt. There are even windows that are still fully in tact on the upper floors while it seems that a lot of the bottom windows have been blown out. This suggests to me that what really made the impact was made by some type of missile or by a tremendously smaller aircraft.
There is no evidence at the site of materials such as seats, parts of the engine, bodies or even luggage. If the alleged plane did hit the Pentagon, there would be more evidence than people could get their hands on which is what reinforces the theory that the Boeing 757 could not possibly have flown into the Pentagon. The government of the United States of America have lied to the whole world about events that occurred that horrible day, what are they really trying to hide?